 |
| Riot in France |
In mid-October 2026, France experienced some of its most intense urban unrest in years.
Hundreds of thousands of people—estimates ranged from about 550,000 according to authorities to higher figures from organizers—took to the streets in largely peaceful protests against rising fuel prices, the cost of living, and deteriorating public services, including schools.
What began as demonstrations quickly escalated in multiple cities into rioting, looting, arson, and clashes with police. The 19th-century town hall in Limoges was largely destroyed by fire. Shops were ransacked, public buildings attacked, and nearly 1,000 police and gendarmes were injured, with about 2,400 arrests reported.
French President Emmanuel Macron addressed the nation from the Élysée Palace. Distinguishing between those with “legitimate demands” and those who turned to destruction, he stated: “Nothing justifies it, nothing explains it, nothing excuses it. Tonight, we all feel anger and shame.”
He described the violence as “unbridled,” blamed ultra-left fringe groups joined by criminals, and vowed that those who destroyed, looted, or sought to undermine the Republic would face consequences, while stopping short of a nationwide state of emergency.
Such scenes are not isolated. They form part of a broader pattern of social friction visible across much of the world. According to the Carnegie Endowment for International Peace’s Global Protest Tracker, more than 107 significant anti-government protests occurred in more than 57 countries over a recent 12-month period (with figures last comprehensively updated around September 2026), and dozens remained active.
These movements have been driven by economic pressures, governance failures, inequality, corruption concerns, and political disputes.
France’s events sit within this larger wave of unrest rather than as a unique national failure.
The frequency and intensity of these episodes raise a deeper question for many observers of current events: What does the Bible say about the apparent breakdown of law and order on a worldwide scale?
Biblical Foretelling of Increasing Lawlessness
The Bible does not present history as a random sequence of crises. In the Gospel of Matthew, Jesus’ disciples asked him about “the sign of [his] presence and of the conclusion of the system of things.” In his response, known as the Olivet Discourse, Jesus outlined a composite sign that would mark that period. Among the elements he listed was this: “Because of the increasing of lawlessness, the love of the greater number will grow cold.” (Matthew 24:3, 12)
The Greek term rendered “lawlessness” (anomia) carries the sense of living without regard for law—particularly divine standards—or in active opposition to them. Jesus linked this rise in lawlessness directly to a cooling of love among the majority of people. The connection is logical: when self-restraint weakens and regard for others diminishes, violence, theft, arson, and social fragmentation become more common.
Love here is not mere sentiment; it is the practical concern for the well-being of others that underpins stable communities.
The apostle Paul reinforced this picture when writing to Timothy about conditions “in the last days.” He warned that “critical times hard to deal with will be here.” People would be “lovers of themselves, lovers of money, boastful, haughty, blasphemers, disobedient to parents, unthankful, disloyal, having no natural affection, not open to any agreement, slanderers, without self-control, fierce, without love of goodness, betrayers, headstrong, puffed up with pride, lovers of pleasures rather than lovers of God, having an appearance of godliness but proving false to its power.” (2 Timothy 3:1-5)
These character traits form a coherent diagnosis. Self-centeredness and lack of self-control erode the internal restraints that laws alone cannot supply. When large numbers of people prioritize personal grievance, immediate gain, or ideological intensity over restraint and mutual respect, public order frays.
Riots that begin with economic complaints can attract opportunistic looting and pure destruction because the moral brakes have weakened. The “fierce” quality Paul mentions appears in the readiness to use force against symbols of authority or simply against property and people nearby.
This is not a claim that every protester is lawless or that every grievance is illegitimate. The Bible distinguishes between righteous indignation against injustice and the uncontrolled expression of anger that harms the innocent. What it does forecast is a general increase in the scale and frequency of such uncontrolled behavior as a feature of the time period it calls the last days or the conclusion of the system of things.
Context and Analysis: Why This Pattern Fits Observed Trends
Historical periods of upheaval have always produced disorder. What distinguishes the biblical description is its prediction of a global and intensifying pattern tied to specific moral and spiritual characteristics rather than to any single political ideology or economic system.
Economic strain—high living costs, inequality, failing public services—acts as a trigger, but the underlying traits Paul lists help explain why responses so often turn destructive rather than constructive. Social media and rapid information flows can amplify grievances and coordinate action across cities and borders, accelerating the spread of both protest and violence in ways earlier generations did not experience.
Observers across the political spectrum note rising polarization, declining trust in institutions, and a cultural emphasis on individual grievance over shared civic norms. From a biblical standpoint, these are symptoms of the deeper shift Jesus and Paul described: love growing cold and self-control diminishing. The result is not merely more crime statistics, but a climate in which ordinary rule of law feels more fragile in multiple countries simultaneously.
Different traditions interpret the timing and details of these prophecies variously. Some see them as primarily fulfilled in the first century with the destruction of Jerusalem; others view them as having progressive or dual applications that intensify toward a future climax.
The original post and many readers who find these passages relevant today understand the “last days” as an extended period that includes our own time, marked by the very trends of worldwide unrest, moral hardness, and social fragmentation now observable. The predictive accuracy of the character sketch in 2 Timothy 3 remains striking regardless of precise chronological debates.
A Message of Hope Beyond the Disorder
The same Scriptures that describe the problem also offer a clear resolution. The disorder is temporary. Psalm 37 provides one of the most direct statements of hope: “Just a little while longer, and the wicked will be no more; you will look at where they were, and they will not be there. But the meek will possess the earth, and they will find exquisite delight in the abundance of peace.” (Psalm 37:10, 11)
This is not a vague aspiration. It is presented as a divine promise. The “meek”—those who are teachable, humble, and willing to submit to God’s standards—will inherit a cleaned-up earth under righteous rule. Lawlessness will not be managed indefinitely by human governments of varying competence; it will be removed. The Bible’s larger narrative points to God’s Kingdom as the permanent solution that restores order based on perfect justice and love rather than on fluctuating human laws and enforcement capacity.
This hope is presented as reliable precisely because the same source accurately described the preceding conditions. When people see the predicted increase in lawlessness and the cooling of love, they are invited to recognize the reliability of the larger message that includes the coming end of those conditions.
Why This Perspective Offers Real Value
Short news reports capture the immediate shock of burning buildings and presidential condemnations. A deeper engagement with the biblical framework situates those events within a longer historical and moral arc. It neither excuses violence nor dismisses underlying grievances; instead, it identifies root character issues that pure policy responses struggle to address. It also refuses despair. The forecast of increasing disorder is paired with the certainty of its eventual and complete removal.
For those troubled by the images from France, the statistics from the Carnegie tracker, or similar scenes elsewhere, the Bible’s response is neither alarmism nor complacency. It is an invitation to examine the evidence of the times against the ancient description, and then to consider the practical hope it holds out—a world in which the meek truly inherit the earth and peace is abundant rather than fragile.
Readers interested in exploring these themes further can examine the full context of Matthew 24, 2 Timothy 3, Psalm 37, and related passages on the reliability of Bible prophecy and the nature of God’s Kingdom. The events of recent weeks do not stand alone; they form part of a pattern long anticipated, and that pattern itself points beyond the present turbulence.
Samuel O. Sulaimon is the founder and Editor-in-Chief of Naijapiz. He covers Global, News, Sports, Finance, Faiths, Education, Politics and Technology.
Post a Comment