 |
| Africa Locals |
On the International Day for the Eradication of Poverty in mid-October 2026, European Union Ambassador to Nigeria and ECOWAS Gautier Mignot delivered a stark assessment in Abuja.
“Today, Nigeria is probably the country in the world with the highest number of people living under the poverty threshold,” he stated. The remark, made under the UN’s 2026–2028 theme “United for Peace and Human Rights” with its specific focus on “Safe Homes for All,” underscores a painful paradox: Africa’s largest economy and most populous nation is also home to the greatest absolute number of people trapped in deprivation.
Mignot’s observation is not hyperbole. With Nigeria’s population estimated at roughly 242–244 million in 2026, even moderate poverty rates translate into staggering headcounts. The 2022 National Multidimensional Poverty Index (MPI) from Nigeria’s National Bureau of Statistics found 133 million people — about 63 percent of the then-population — suffering overlapping deprivations in health, education, living standards, and work.
More recent World Bank estimates project national poverty rates around 61–63 percent in 2025–2026, equating to approximately 139–140 million people living below the poverty line. Extreme poverty figures hover near 123 million (around 50.8 percent under the $3/day international line in some assessments). By comparison, India’s larger population has far lower absolute numbers in extreme poverty due to sustained reductions over decades; China has largely eliminated it. Nigeria’s combination of high fertility, rapid population growth (about 2 percent annually), conflict, and uneven growth keeps the absolute total at the global peak.
Multidimensional Reality: Beyond Income
Poverty in Nigeria is rarely just about money. The MPI captures simultaneous shortfalls: lack of clean water or sanitation, inadequate housing, limited schooling, poor nutrition, and exposure to shocks.
Rural areas fare far worse (around 72 percent multidimensionally poor in 2022 data) than urban ones (about 42 percent). Northern states, especially the North-East and North-West, record the highest intensities — Sokoto once approached 91 percent in some measures. Recent UNDP/OPHI Global MPI updates show further deterioration: using harmonised data, the rate rose from 33 percent in 2021 to 38.7 percent in 2024, adding 17.9 million people (the largest absolute increase worldwide in that period). A separate 2024 national estimate placed the figure at 113.3 million (48.7 percent).
These are not interchangeable metrics, but all point in the same direction: earlier gains have reversed.
Drivers are structural and interlocking. Insecurity in the North-East (Boko Haram and ISWAP remnants), banditry and farmer-herder conflicts in the North-West and North-Central, and communal violence displace millions and destroy livelihoods. Climate pressures — the shrinking Lake Chad Basin supporting over 50 million people, flooding, and desertification — compound the problem.
Macroeconomic shocks from fuel subsidy removal and exchange-rate unification under the Tinubu administration stabilised fiscal indicators and boosted reserves above $42 billion, but they also eroded real incomes for the majority. Inflation, though moderating toward the mid-teens in 2026 from peaks above 30 percent, has left households with permanently lower purchasing power.
Agriculture, which employs most of the poor, has lagged services and industry growth. Food insecurity remains acute: estimates suggest 33–36 million people face crisis-level hunger in lean seasons. documents.worldbank.org
Housing inadequacy — central to the 2026 theme — affects tens of millions. A national deficit of around 17 million units and poor living conditions for an estimated 87 million people mean that “safe homes” remain out of reach for many.
Without secure shelter, education, health, and economic participation suffer, perpetuating intergenerational poverty. As Mignot noted, households unable to meet basic needs can scarcely feel secure or fully exercise fundamental rights. Peace, dignity, and rights are prerequisites for lasting poverty reduction — not optional add-ons.
The EU Response: €45 Million Humanitarian Plus Longer-Term Systems Work
Against this backdrop, Mignot announced nearly €45 million (roughly $50–52 million depending on exchange rates) in EU humanitarian assistance for Nigeria in 2026, channelled through the European Civil Protection and Humanitarian Aid Operations (ECHO). The funds target conflict-affected and crisis-prone areas, prioritising emergency needs while linking to resilience. This sits within a broader European commitment: earlier in the year the EU allocated hundreds of millions across West and Central Africa, including the Lake Chad Basin and North-West Nigeria, as part of a larger global humanitarian budget amid donor fatigue elsewhere.
Critically, the EU frames humanitarian aid as a bridge, not a destination. Mignot emphasised coordination with Nigerian authorities under an ongoing “humanitarian transition,” in which federal and state governments progressively assume greater funding and coordination responsibility.
Immediate relief addresses severe acute malnutrition and displacement; longer-term programmes aim to build sustainable exits from poverty.
On the development side, the EU’s Supporting Sustainable Social Protection Systems in Nigeria programme partners with government institutions, UNICEF, GIZ, the International Labour Organization, ActionAid, and Oxfam. It operates in Abia, Benue, Oyo, Sokoto, Kebbi, Adamawa, and Borno states.
Focus areas include strengthening social protection policies, expanding social registers to identify more vulnerable households, improving data systems for targeting, and supporting the review of the National Social Protection Policy plus state-level policies and a Social Protection Bill. Multidimensional assessments help prioritise overlapping deprivations so resources reach those facing the most simultaneous shortfalls.
Mignot acknowledged Nigerian government initiatives: the National Social Safety Net Programme, Nigeria Community Action for Resilience and Economic Stimulus (NG-CARES), the Renewed Hope Social Protection Programme, and the Household Prosperity and Empowerment Social Protection Project (backed by the World Bank).
These involve cash transfers, livelihood support, and efforts to strengthen safety nets. Coverage has expanded, yet World Bank analyses note that social protection spending remains low relative to need (historically under 0.2 percent of GDP in some years) and reaches only a fraction of the poor.
Scaling effectively — while controlling leakage and improving targeting — is the central challenge.
In parallel, the EU announced €20 million under the European Peace Facility for the Nigerian Armed Forces, focused on counter-terrorism capabilities (including counter-drone and counter-IED support).
Security and poverty are inseparable: without stabilisation in the North, agricultural recovery, market access, and investment remain constrained.
Defence Minister Christopher Musa (rtd) welcomed the package during a recent meeting with Mignot, noting gradual improvements in security while highlighting persistent kidnapping and isolated attacks, plus the strategic importance of denying terrorists Lake Chad strongholds.
Broader Context and the Path Forward
Nigeria’s poverty ranking reflects both scale and stalled progress. The country achieved notable multidimensional reductions in the 2010s, but the combination of COVID-19, insecurity, policy shocks, and population growth reversed them. Global MPI data show sub-Saharan Africa still accounts for over half of the world’s 1.2 billion multidimensionally poor people; Nigeria is the single largest national contributor in absolute terms.
Solutions require more than aid. Domestic resource mobilisation, job-rich growth (especially in agriculture and light manufacturing), human capital investment, and accountable governance are essential. The EU–UN strategic dialogue in 2026 reviewed over 30 joint projects worth more than $500 million, spanning education, governance, human rights, and security — evidence of triangulation with Nigerian federal and state governments. Yet as Mignot and UN counterparts have stressed, external partners cannot substitute for sustained national ownership.
Civil society voices, including ActionAid Nigeria marking the same day, have echoed the numbers and demanded greater investment in affordable housing, social protection, and economic justice.
The housing deficit and food insecurity figures illustrate how poverty is experienced daily: empty plates, unsafe shelters, children out of school, and limited agency.
Mignot’s closing note was unambiguous: “Humanitarian needs cannot wait, and poverty either.” The fight must be year-round, coordinated across government, civil society, communities, and partners. Nigeria’s demographic dividend — a very young population — could become a powerful engine of growth if education, skills, health, and security improve. Without decisive progress on the poverty front, that potential risks becoming a source of further instability.
The EU’s €45 million is a meaningful contribution to immediate needs in hard-hit areas. Its greater value may lie in the accompanying systems work and the insistence that peace, rights, and sustainable pathways must move together. For a country of Nigeria’s size and ambition, the ultimate measure will not be the volume of international statements or aid packages, but whether the absolute number of people living in poverty begins a sustained decline.
Samuel O. Sulaimon is the founder and Editor-in-Chief of Naijapiz. He covers News, Sports, Finance, Faiths, Education, Politics and Technology.
Post a Comment